Read the original article here.

---

Understanding Internet Bots: A Resource in the Context of "The Dead Internet Files"

In the digital age, the internet has become an indispensable part of our lives. We use it for communication, commerce, information, and entertainment. However, increasingly, the activity we see and interact with online isn't purely human. Automated software applications, known as bots, constitute a significant and growing portion of internet traffic and activity. The sheer scale and diverse functions of these bots, particularly non-human-driven or deceptive ones, are central to discussions around theories like "The Dead Internet Files," which posits that the internet is becoming less authentically human and more dominated by automated content and interactions.

This resource explores what internet bots are, their various types, their functions, and their significant impact on the online landscape, particularly through the lens of how their prevalence shapes the feeling and reality of the internet described by "The Dead Internet Files."

What are Internet Bots?

At its core, an internet bot is a program designed to perform automated tasks over the internet. Unlike typical software used by a human user, bots operate programmatically, often performing repetitive actions much faster and on a larger scale than a person could.

Internet Bot (Web Robot, Robot, Bot): A software application that runs automated tasks (scripts) on the Internet. Bots typically operate rapidly and on a large scale, often with the intent to imitate human activity or perform functions that are tedious or impossible for humans at scale. They generally act as the "client" in a client-server relationship, interacting with web servers.

Bots are essentially automated internet users. While some are designed for beneficial purposes, many operate with malicious intent or contribute to an environment where distinguishing genuine human activity from automated actions becomes challenging. The scale of bot activity is staggering; estimates suggest that more than half of all web traffic is generated by bots, highlighting their pervasive presence.

Servers have mechanisms like robots.txt files to dictate rules for bot behavior, particularly for crawlers. However, adhering to these rules is often voluntary for the bot's creator, making enforcement difficult and allowing many bots to operate outside intended boundaries.

Categories and Functions of Internet Bots

Bots serve a wide range of purposes, from essential web functions to malicious activities that distort the online environment. Understanding these categories helps illuminate how bots contribute to the changing nature of the internet.

Web Crawlers and Search Engine Spiders

These are perhaps the most fundamental and widely accepted types of bots. They are essential for the functioning of search engines and other data aggregation services.

• Function: Crawl or spider the web by automatically fetching, analyzing, and indexing content from web servers. They follow links to discover new pages and update their databases.
• Use Case: Powering search engines like Google, Bing, etc., enabling users to find information online. They are crucial for indexing the vast amount of data on the internet.
• Context: While not directly contributing to the "Dead Internet Files" in a negative sense, their massive scale of automated access underscores how much of the internet's interaction isn't human browsing but machine-driven collection. Servers rely on robots.txt to manage how these powerful bots access their content.

Communication and Chatbots

These bots are designed to interact with human users, often mimicking conversational exchanges.

Chatbot: An internet bot designed to simulate conversation with human users, typically through text or voice. They are used for various purposes, including providing information, customer service, or entertainment.

• Platforms: Used in Instant Messaging (IM), Internet Relay Chat (IRC), and integrated into web interfaces and social media platforms (e.g., Facebook Messenger bots, Twitter bots).
• Functions:
  • Answering user questions in natural language (e.g., providing weather reports, sports scores, currency conversions).
  • Providing customer support or information services.
  • Offering entertainment (like early examples such as SmarterChild).
  • Monitoring communication channels (e.g., IRC bots listening for keywords to provide help or enforce rules).
• Context: The rise of chatbots, particularly in customer service, shifts interactions away from human agents. While efficient, this contributes to a feeling of less human-to-human contact online. Early development history traces back to pioneering AI concepts like the Turing Test and programs like ELIZA, reflecting a long-standing goal of creating human-like conversational agents.

Social Bots

Social bots are designed specifically to operate within social networking services, often with the goal of influencing discussions or mimicking human social behavior.

• Function: Execute repetitive instructions on social media platforms to establish connections, spread information (or misinformation), or influence trends. They are programmed to mimic patterns of human conversation and interaction.
• History: Their conceptual roots connect to early AI like ELIZA and the development of Natural Language Processing (NLP).
• Impact (Crucial for "Dead Internet Files"):
  • Mimicry and Deception: They are designed to appear as genuine users, making it difficult for humans to discern who they are interacting with online. This erosion of trust is a key element of the "Dead Internet Files" concern.
  • Amplification and Manipulation: Social bots can rapidly spread content, including unverified information or propaganda, by liking, sharing, or retweeting based on specific keywords or agendas (as seen in reports regarding political elections like the 2016 US and 2017 UK).
  • Polarization and Disruption: By flooding platforms with biased or inflammatory content, they can contribute to the volatility and mistrust in online political discussions (particularly noted on platforms like X/Twitter).
  • The "Bot Effect": Social bots interacting with human users can create vulnerabilities and amplify polarizing influences, potentially altering perceptions of reality for emotionally volatile users. This suggests that bot presence doesn't just add artificial numbers; it can actively change human online behavior and belief.

Commercial Bots

These bots are used for various commercial purposes, often related to transactions, data collection, or marketing.

• Function: Automate business processes, transactions, or data gathering for commercial advantage.
• Use Cases:
  • Automated Trading: Used on platforms like stock exchanges or betting sites (e.g., Betfair developed an API to manage bot traffic). This automates and speeds up transactions beyond human capability.
  • App Store Manipulation: Bot farms create fake accounts and activity to write positive reviews or inflate download/rating numbers, artificially boosting an app's perceived popularity. This directly distorts platform metrics.
  • Customer Service Chatbots: (Also fall under Communication Bots) Used by companies like Domino's (for ordering) or on platforms like Facebook Messenger to handle customer interactions, aiming for cost savings by reducing the need for human staff. This further reduces human interaction points.
• Impact: Commercial bots, especially those involved in manipulation (app stores, potentially ad fraud bots discussed below), contribute to an online environment where popularity, reviews, and engagement metrics can be artificially inflated or faked, undermining trust in online indicators.

Malicious Bots

This category includes bots designed for harmful activities, ranging from petty disruption to large-scale cybercrime. These bots significantly contribute to the negative aspects and the "deadness" perceived in the internet, filling it with spam, fraud, and attacks rather than genuine human activity.

• Pervasiveness: "More than 94.2% of websites have experienced a bot attack," highlighting the scale of this problem.
• Types and Functions:
  • Spambots: Harvest email addresses, post spam content in comments or forums (often with malicious links), flooding platforms with unsolicited material.
  • Scraping Bots: Steal website content for reuse without permission, contributing to content dilution and intellectual property issues.
  • Registration Bots: Automatically sign up for services using a target email address to flood the inbox, sometimes as a distraction during a security breach.
  • Bots for Attacks:
    • Botnets: Networks of compromised computers (zombies) controlled by a single attacker, used to launch coordinated attacks.
    • DDoS Bots: Used in Distributed Denial-of-Service attacks to flood a target server with traffic, making it unavailable.

      Botnet: A network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge, for example, to send spam or launch DDoS attacks. DDoS Attack (Distributed Denial-of-Service): A malicious attempt to disrupt the normal traffic of a targeted server, service, or network by overwhelming the target or its surrounding infrastructure with a flood of Internet traffic from multiple compromised computer systems (often a botnet).

  • Fraud Bots:
    • Click Fraud Bots: Simulate clicks on online advertisements to generate fraudulent revenue.
    • Viewbots: Create fake views for online content (videos, articles) to inflate popularity metrics (e.g., the CNN iReport case mentioned).
    • Traffic Bots: Generate fake website traffic to extract money from advertisers based on inflated visitor counts (a study found over half of ads shown in certain campaigns weren't served to humans).
  • Game Bots: Automate repetitive tasks in online games (like resource farming), disrupting game economies and fair play.
  • Ticket Bots: Rapidly buy up large quantities of high-demand tickets (concerts, events) for resale at inflated prices, causing frustration for human fans.
  • Forum Disruption Bots: Post inflammatory or nonsensical messages automatically to derail discussions and harass users in online communities.
• Impact (for "Dead Internet Files"): Malicious bots directly degrade the quality and trustworthiness of the internet. They fill it with noise (spam, irrelevant content), disrupt legitimate services (DDoS), distort metrics (fake views, traffic, clicks), and actively interfere with human interaction (forum bots). This makes the internet feel less like a space for genuine human connection and more like a battleground or a landscape polluted by automated threats and fakery.

Protection Against Bots

Given the pervasive and often harmful nature of bots, significant efforts are made to detect and mitigate their activity. This ongoing arms race shapes the online user experience.

• CAPTCHA:

  CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing Test to Tell Computers and Humans Apart): A challenge-response test used in computing to determine whether the user is human. It typically involves tasks that are easy for humans to solve but difficult for automated bots, such as recognizing distorted text, identifying objects in images, or solving simple puzzles.

  • Mechanism: Presents a task (like typing distorted characters, identifying images) designed to be simple for humans but hard for computers.
  • Use: Common protection against registration bots, spambots, and other automated attacks on web forms or logins.
  • Limitations: While widely used, CAPTCHAs are not foolproof. Bots can sometimes bypass them using advanced character recognition, exploiting security flaws, or by outsourcing the solving process to human labor farms at low cost. They can also be frustrating for legitimate human users.

• Source Reliability (for specific contexts): In situations like academic surveys, ensuring participants come from known, reliable groups (e.g., internal company departments) can prevent bots from submitting automated responses and skewing results.

• Dedicated Anti-Bot Services: Many companies specialize in providing sophisticated solutions to detect and block malicious bot traffic.

  • Examples: Companies like DataDome, Akamai, Imperva offer services.
  • Functionality: These services use advanced analysis of traffic patterns, user behavior, and technical fingerprints to distinguish between human users and bots, protecting against DDoS attacks, scraping, fraud, and other automated threats.
  • Consideration: While effective, these services can be expensive, posing a barrier for smaller websites or organizations.

Human Interaction with Social Bots: The Erosion of Trust

The increasing presence of bots designed to mimic human interaction directly impacts how humans perceive and engage with online platforms. This is a core concern within "The Dead Internet Files" framework.

• Awareness and Mistrust: Users are becoming increasingly aware that not everyone they interact with online is a real person. This leads to uncertainty and suspicion when communicating with unfamiliar accounts or engaging in online discussions.
• Masquerading: The ability of social bots to "masquerade" as humans blurs the line between authentic and artificial online presence. This makes platforms feel less populated by genuine individuals and more by potentially deceptive automated entities.
• Communication Concerns: Interacting with bots, even sophisticated chatbots, can raise issues like lack of clarity, the absence of non-verbal cues, and cultural misunderstandings. Concerns exist about whether bot messages are truly effective or potentially damaging (e.g., avoiding damage to feelings, minimizing impositions, clarity issues).
• Perception of Value: Some humans view bots as inherently less intelligent or worthy of respect than other humans, creating a social distance even when interaction occurs.
• Impact on Relationships: Critics argue that the rise of social bots diminishes opportunities for genuine human connection online, replacing meaningful interaction with automated responses and artificial engagement.
• Privacy and Regulation: The presence of social bots raises new privacy concerns, particularly regarding data harvesting and manipulation. There are calls for clearer identification of bots and potentially stricter legislation to manage their behavior and ensure transparency.

Social Bots and Political Discussions: A Volatile Mix

The intersection of social bots and political discourse online exemplifies how automated agents can destabilize and undermine vital public forums.

• Platform Instability: Platforms meant for discussion, especially political ones (like X/Twitter), become volatile due to the combined activity of humans and bots.
• Misuse and Mistrust: Bots amplifying partisan messages, spreading misinformation, and generating artificial support or opposition for viewpoints contribute to a climate of mistrust. Users find it harder to gauge genuine public opinion or trust the information they encounter.
• Skewed Discourse: Bot activity can create an echo chamber effect or artificially amplify fringe views, making the online political landscape seem more extreme or populated by certain opinions than the actual human population might reflect. This skews the perceived reality of political sentiment.

Conclusion: Bots and the Changing Face of the Internet

Internet bots are a fundamental and ever-evolving component of the digital world. From essential web crawlers that organize information to sophisticated malicious programs that steal data and disrupt services, bots operate across the spectrum of online activity.

Their massive scale—generating over half of all internet traffic—means that the internet is, quantitatively, already dominated by non-human activity. More importantly, the increasing sophistication and prevalence of social bots, malicious bots, and bots used for commercial manipulation (like ad fraud or app store boosting) fundamentally alter the quality of the online experience.

Within the context of "The Dead Internet Files," the rise of bots highlights a critical shift: the internet is becoming a place where automated systems frequently interact with each other, generate content, distort metrics, and even mimic human behavior. This makes it harder for humans to find authentic connection, trust the information they see, or distinguish genuine activity from the artificial. The battle between bot creators and those building defenses is ongoing, and the outcome will continue to shape whether the internet feels like a vibrant, human-centric space or one increasingly populated and defined by automated agents.